| John Battle, MP for Leeds West, who
has campaigned for Armley asbestos victims, used a Parliamentary device,
Standing Order 24, in the House of Commons today to demand a full 3 hour
emergency debate on compensation for asbestos victims.
It is now estimated that as well as hundreds who have died and are dying
of mesothelioma for simply living in the neighbourhood of the JW Roberts
factory in Leeds before it closed in 1956, nationally as a result of the
use of asbestos there are now 1,500 mesothelioma victims a year and the
number is rising rapidly.
Five years ago in a landmark judgement we won a case in the courts to
prove that Turner & Newall, who had taken over JW Roberts, were responsible
for polluting people in the Armley neighbourhood. A handful of compensation
claims have been paid out. However in September Turner & Newall (T&N),
once the UK's largest asbestos manufacturers, was taken over by the US
company Federal Mogul. On 1 October Federal Mogul applied in the UK courts
to put its UK subsidiaries into administration. This immediately blocks
the compensation payments to UK asbestos victims of T&N.
The administrators are now refusing to deal with legitimate compensation
claims despite the court judgement. Cheques to victims have bounced. One
victim received a letter offering compensation and a notice in the next
post saying that the offer was worthless as the company was bankrupt.
Administration proceedings can take years, but the administrators have
three months to produce a financial statement and have a creditors' meeting
for all UK subsidiaries. In the meantime the US parent company has ringfenced
its liabilities and under US law can continue trading and making a profit.
Furthermore there is real doubt over the insurance cover provided by
T&N. If they were not genuinely insured the question arises - how
were they allowed to get away with it? The new Financial Compensation
Act that covers victims of failed insurance may not apply, and in any
event only covers workers, not people who lived in the neighbourhood.
They cannot claim industrial injuries benefit (because they were not exposed
to asbestos in their paid employment) nor can they claim under the 1979
Workers' Compensation Act. They are outside the reach of the new Financial
Services Compensation Act.
This is not just about a few cases in Armley, nor is it just about T&N.
It could affect all asbestos claims in Britain. This year has been a truly
annus horribilis for asbestos victims. Judgements seem to be protecting
the companies rather than the victims, as we have seen in the Chester
Street case in January, the Fairchild case in February, the T&N case
in October and the Fairchild case again this week.
Asbestos victims are the most vulnerable, totally innocent victims who
die of the worst imaginable forms of cancer. They did not bring this on
themselves. They deserve compensation. We need an urgent debate so that
we can have a co-ordinated government response to ensure victims get compensation
and the polluters pay. The victims have not got years to live and wait
and wait for lengthy company insolvency proceedings. |